Comments on Model Regulation 171, Definition of “Pre-Existing Condition”, loss ratios, & Additional Matters

Summary

The NAIC Consumer Representatives submitted comments on the Model Regulation to Implement the Supplementary and Short-Term Health Insurance Minimum Standards Model Act (#171). They emphasized the need to update Model 171, which has been delayed for over two years. Key recommendations include a clear definition of “pre-existing condition,” shortening the “look-back” period, and increasing transparency for consumers. They advocate for consistent minimum standards across all plans covered by the model, including short-term and supplemental plans, to simplify regulations and protect consumers. They also stress the importance of addressing disclosures, notices, and loss ratios to ensure comprehensive consumer protection.

070221_Model-171_Consumer-Rep-Comments
Comments on Model Regulation 171, Definition of “Pre-Existing Condition”, loss ratios, & Additional Matters

Related resources

Consumer-rep-comments-model-171-sections-9-and-10-11182022
Comments on Model 171, Required Disclosure Provisions
Preview of Comments on Model 171, Required Disclosure Provisions PDF document.
Model.171_110121_CR.Presentation
Presentation on types of health plans covered in Model 171 model act
Preview of Presentation on types of health plans covered in Model 171 model act PDF document.

Discover more resources

Explore resources by clicking on topics to filter documents.

Prescription drugs
Other health
Other
Mental and behavioral health
Major reports
Long term care
Health equity
Appeals, denials, and prior authorization
Prescription drugs
Other health
Other
Mental and behavioral health
Major reports
Long term care
Health equity
Appeals, denials, and prior authorization